Now 13th Zodiac Sign With Ophiuchus

13 th sign of the zodiac and the change in the zodiac calendar has sent thousands of people to an astrological identity crisis.Amid snowball shock on the proposal for the collection of the 13 th sign of the zodiac, astrologers are trying various calm the panic of astrology believers with the assurance that nothing has changed in the stars. Meanwhile, the astronomer who started the whole ordeal, it's been to say that he never claimed that Ophiuchus should be added to the existing list of 12 signs.


It all started with the interview astronomer Parke Kunkle the Minneapolis Star-Tribune, during which the board member of the Minnesota Planetarium Society said the publication of how ancient Babylonians developed the signs of the zodiac.

Kunkle explained that Babylonian zodiac signs based on the constellation of the sun 'in' on the birthday of a person. As millennia passed, the gravitational pull of the moon has made the Earth wobble on its axis on the creation of a bump than a month in the alignment of the stars, Kunkle is cited in the report of January 9 .
"When they [the astrologers] say that the sun is in Pisces, it is not really in Pisces," Kunkle said, indicating that most readers may be reading horoscope predictions can be wrong and rationalization their behavior in bad traits.
Kunkle, a professor of astronomy at Minneapolis Community and Technical College, also said there is no physical connection between the constellations and personality traits.
"Sure, we can connect the harvest to the stars. But personality? No "
Kunkle's remark is that people no longer look to the sky to understand astrology, the report concludes with a note to the discussion by saying that this could be the reason why sometimes "why one day there might have been exactly as predicted. "